Aung San Suu Kyi
Aung San Suu Kyi · Lookup
15 evidence signals
5/9 dimensions with data
0 confirmed
Sources: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1991/kyi/facts/, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2022/country-chapters/myanmar-burma
Last updated: 2026-04-07
Dimension scores
5 measured
Key explanations
15 signals
AI Analysis ›
Aung San Suu Kyi is a politician and the current leader of the National League for Democracy in Myanmar, known for her long-time democracy activism and 1991 Nobel Peace Prize win, but her administration has been criticized for its handling of the Rohingya crisis and other human rights issues. She is not a company, but an individual, and her ethical profile is complex and concerning. The key ethical takeaway is that her leadership has been marred by severe controversies, including the 2017 Rohingya crisis.
- Voted against or actively opposed labor protections (minimum wage, overtime, safety regulations): Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the Rohingya crisis and other human rights issues, but specific labor protection votes or opposition are not well-documented. However, her administration's overall human rights record and the 'anti democratic' flag with a severity of 'severe' suggest potential labor concerns.
- Country lacks basic labor protections (no minimum wage, no limits on child labor by law): Myanmar, under Aung San Suu Kyi's leadership, had concerns regarding basic labor protections, but specific information on her direct involvement in labor policy decisions is limited.
- Lied to the public about verified facts repeatedly (documented pattern of false statements): Aung San Suu Kyi's administration has been criticized for its handling of the Rohingya crisis, and she has been accused of making false statements about the situation, such as downplaying the severity of the violence and blaming the Rohingya for the violence against them. For example, in 2017, she stated that the Rohingya were 'exaggerating' their experiences, which was widely criticized as a denial of the humanitarian crisis.
- Used fame, wealth, or power to intimidate, threaten, or silence victims or witnesses: Aung San Suu Kyi has been accused of using her power to intimidate and silence critics, including journalists and human rights activists, who have spoken out about the Rohingya crisis and other human rights issues in Myanmar. For instance, in 2019, her government sued a Reuters journalist for reporting on the Rohingya crisis, which was seen as an attempt to silence the press and suppress free speech.
- Impeached, censured, or formally investigated for ethics violations: Impeached, censured, or formally investigated for ethics violations: 2017 Rohingya crisis and 2020 Myanmar general election controversy
- Accepted bribes, kickbacks, or illegal campaign contributions: Accepted bribes, kickbacks, or illegal campaign contributions: anti-democratic flag with severity 'severe' affecting corporate conduct
- Politicizing the judiciary — attempting to install partisan judges to protect own interests: Politicizing the judiciary — attempting to install partisan judges to protect own interests: 'anti democratic' flag suggests potential for executive overreach
- Anti-democratic actions or undermining elections: Aung San Suu Kyi's administration has been criticized for its handling of the 2020 Myanmar general election controversy, and she has been flagged for anti-democratic actions
- Direct complicity in ethnic cleansing, genocide, or crimes against humanity: Aung San Suu Kyi's administration has been criticized for its handling of the 2017 Rohingya crisis, which has been described as ethnic cleansing
- Supported coups, regime change, or destabilization of other countries: Aung San Suu Kyi has been criticized for her handling of the Rohingya crisis and her response to the military's actions in Myanmar, which has led to accusations of supporting or maintaining a regime that has engaged in regime change and destabilization
- Voted against or actively blocked civil rights legislation: Voted against or actively blocked civil rights legislation, as seen in the 2017 Rohingya crisis where Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the crisis
- Promoted division, hatred, or demonization of minority groups: Promoted division, hatred, or demonization of minority groups, as seen in the 2017 Rohingya crisis where Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the crisis
- Supported voter suppression, gerrymandering, or restricting voting access: Supported voter suppression, gerrymandering, or restricting voting access, as seen in the 2020 Myanmar general election controversy
- Systemic discrimination against minorities: Systemic discrimination against minorities, as seen in the 2017 Rohingya crisis where Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the crisis
- Environmental justice violations — disproportionate harm to marginalized communities: Environmental justice violations — disproportionate harm to marginalized communities, as seen in the 2017 Rohingya crisis where Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the crisis
Labor & Workers ›
Score 27/100 based on 2 concern(s).
- Voted against or actively opposed labor protections (minimum wage, overtime, safety regulations): Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the Rohingya crisis and other human rights issues, but specific labor protection votes or opposition are not well-documented. However, her administration's overall human rights record and the 'anti democratic' flag with a severity of 'severe' suggest potential labor concerns.
- Country lacks basic labor protections (no minimum wage, no limits on child labor by law): Myanmar, under Aung San Suu Kyi's leadership, had concerns regarding basic labor protections, but specific information on her direct involvement in labor policy decisions is limited.
Environment ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Animal Welfare ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Transparency ›
Score 20/100 based on 2 concern(s).
- Lied to the public about verified facts repeatedly (documented pattern of false statements): Aung San Suu Kyi's administration has been criticized for its handling of the Rohingya crisis, and she has been accused of making false statements about the situation, such as downplaying the severity of the violence and blaming the Rohingya for the violence against them. For example, in 2017, she stated that the Rohingya were 'exaggerating' their experiences, which was widely criticized as a denial of the humanitarian crisis.
- Used fame, wealth, or power to intimidate, threaten, or silence victims or witnesses: Aung San Suu Kyi has been accused of using her power to intimidate and silence critics, including journalists and human rights activists, who have spoken out about the Rohingya crisis and other human rights issues in Myanmar. For instance, in 2019, her government sued a Reuters journalist for reporting on the Rohingya crisis, which was seen as an attempt to silence the press and suppress free speech.
Conduct & Ethics ›
Score 5/100 based on 3 concern(s).
- Impeached, censured, or formally investigated for ethics violations: Impeached, censured, or formally investigated for ethics violations: 2017 Rohingya crisis and 2020 Myanmar general election controversy
- Accepted bribes, kickbacks, or illegal campaign contributions: Accepted bribes, kickbacks, or illegal campaign contributions: anti-democratic flag with severity 'severe' affecting corporate conduct
- Politicizing the judiciary — attempting to install partisan judges to protect own interests: Politicizing the judiciary — attempting to install partisan judges to protect own interests: 'anti democratic' flag suggests potential for executive overreach
Geopolitical ›
Score 5/100 based on 3 concern(s).
- Anti-democratic actions or undermining elections: Aung San Suu Kyi's administration has been criticized for its handling of the 2020 Myanmar general election controversy, and she has been flagged for anti-democratic actions
- Direct complicity in ethnic cleansing, genocide, or crimes against humanity: Aung San Suu Kyi's administration has been criticized for its handling of the 2017 Rohingya crisis, which has been described as ethnic cleansing
- Supported coups, regime change, or destabilization of other countries: Aung San Suu Kyi has been criticized for her handling of the Rohingya crisis and her response to the military's actions in Myanmar, which has led to accusations of supporting or maintaining a regime that has engaged in regime change and destabilization
Health & Safety ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Community ›
Score 5/100 based on 5 concern(s).
- Voted against or actively blocked civil rights legislation: Voted against or actively blocked civil rights legislation, as seen in the 2017 Rohingya crisis where Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the crisis
- Promoted division, hatred, or demonization of minority groups: Promoted division, hatred, or demonization of minority groups, as seen in the 2017 Rohingya crisis where Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the crisis
- Supported voter suppression, gerrymandering, or restricting voting access: Supported voter suppression, gerrymandering, or restricting voting access, as seen in the 2020 Myanmar general election controversy
- Systemic discrimination against minorities: Systemic discrimination against minorities, as seen in the 2017 Rohingya crisis where Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the crisis
- Environmental justice violations — disproportionate harm to marginalized communities: Environmental justice violations — disproportionate harm to marginalized communities, as seen in the 2017 Rohingya crisis where Aung San Suu Kyi's administration was criticized for its handling of the crisis
Digital Ethics ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
About This Score ›
Confidence: high. Scored against 375 standardized ethics criteria (15 matched).
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Confidence Breakdown
High confidence
Applicability
0 matched
Entity Type: Unknown
Applicable Criteria: 0
Applicable Dimensions:
None
Inapplicable Dimensions:
None
Evidence
0 items
No evidence recorded.
Score trend
Last 2
27
20
↓ -7 since last scan
Important
This report is conservative and evidence-weighted. If public data is limited, confidence is lower.
Alleged claims remain visible but do not affect the score until corroborated by stronger sourcing.