EthicalScanner
Scarlett Johansson
Scarlett Johansson · Lookup
46
Overall
Medium confidence
As of 2026-04-07
How to increase confidence →
2 evidence signals
2/9 dimensions with data
0 confirmed
Sources: ai_research
Last updated: 2026-04-07
Dimension scores
2 measured
Labor
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Environment
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Animal Welfare
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Transparency
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Corporate Conduct
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Geopolitical Ethics
35
Health
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Community
65
Digital Ethics
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Key explanations
2 signals
AI Analysis ›
Scarlett Johansson is an American actress with a complex ethical profile, having been involved in controversies related to her endorsement of SodaStream and her stance on Israeli settlements, but also supporting various charitable causes. She is an individual and not a company, thus not owned by anyone. The key ethical takeaway is that her mixed record on labor, environment, corporate conduct, and community issues warrants careful consideration.
  • Operating in or profiting from occupied territories: Operating in or profiting from occupied territories, specifically the 2018 Israeli settlement controversy
  • Significant verified charitable giving — >5% of profits/income donated to independent organizations with audited impact reports: Support for various charitable organizations, including the American Cancer Society and the Israeli charity, the SodaStream Foundation
Labor & Workers ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Environment ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Animal Welfare ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Transparency ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Conduct & Ethics ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Geopolitical ›
Score 35/100 based on 1 concern(s).
  • Operating in or profiting from occupied territories: Operating in or profiting from occupied territories, specifically the 2018 Israeli settlement controversy
Health & Safety ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Community ›
Score 65/100 based on 1 positive(s).
  • Significant verified charitable giving — >5% of profits/income donated to independent organizations with audited impact reports: Support for various charitable organizations, including the American Cancer Society and the Israeli charity, the SodaStream Foundation
Digital Ethics ›
No specific data found for this dimension.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
About This Score ›
Confidence: medium. Scored against 375 standardized ethics criteria (2 matched).
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Confidence Breakdown
Medium confidence
Applicability
0 matched
Entity Type: Unknown
Applicable Criteria: 0
Applicable Dimensions: None
Inapplicable Dimensions: None
Evidence
0 items
No evidence recorded.
Score trend
First scan for this product. Trend data will appear after rescan.
Important
This report is conservative and evidence-weighted. If public data is limited, confidence is lower. Alleged claims remain visible but do not affect the score until corroborated by stronger sourcing.
Notice