EthicalScanner
Deep Clean Facial Cleanser
Neutrogena · Lookup
51
Overall
Low confidence
No certifications detected. Ingredients not available. Identified by image (limited data)
How to increase confidence →
9 evidence signals
4/8 dimensions with data
Sources: EthicScan Company Database, EthicScan Analysis
Last updated: 2026-01-06
Dimension scores
4 measured
Labor
56
Environment
50
Animal Welfare
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Transparency
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Corporate Conduct
43
Geopolitical Ethics
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Health
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Community
62
Key explanations
9 signals
AI Analysis ›
The Neutrogena Deep Clean Facial Cleanser may have some environmental and health concerns due to its ingredients and packaging, but it also has some positive aspects such as its affordability and wide availability. The product's ingredients and manufacturing process may have labor and environmental implications. Consumer reviews reportedly mention both positive and negative aspects of the product.
  • potential environmental impact of packaging
  • possible health concerns due to unknown ingredients
  • labor practices in ingredient sourcing
  • affordability
  • wide availability
  • reportedly effective for some skin types
Labor ›
1 signal(s) found affecting this dimension.
  • Company: Neutrogena Corporation (Labor score: 60)
Environment ›
1 signal(s) found affecting this dimension.
  • Company: Neutrogena Corporation (Environment score: 55)
Animal Welfare ›
No specific data found. Score reflects baseline estimate.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Transparency ›
No specific data found. Score reflects baseline estimate.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Corporate Conduct ›
5 signal(s) found affecting this dimension.
  • Company: Neutrogena Corporation (Corporate Conduct score: 65)
  • Reported concern: 2014: Neutrogena faced a class-action lawsuit over its Naturals brand, which claimed to be 90% natural but contained some synthetic ingredients (impacts score by -8)
  • Reported concern: 2019: Johnson & Johnson, Neutrogena's parent company, faced lawsuits and criticism over the presence of asbestos in some of its talc-based products (impacts score by -8)
  • Positive: Leaping Bunny certification for cruelty-free practices
  • Positive: Partnership with the Skin Cancer Foundation to promote sun safety and skin cancer awareness
Geopolitical Ethics ›
No specific data found. Score reflects baseline estimate.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Health ›
No specific data found. Score reflects baseline estimate.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Community ›
1 signal(s) found affecting this dimension.
  • Company: Neutrogena Corporation (Community score: 70)
About This Score ›
Based on 9 data points. Confidence: 43%. Higher confidence = more data available.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Evidence
0 items
No evidence recorded.
Score trend
First scan for this product. Trend data will appear after rescan.
Important
This report is conservative and evidence-weighted. If public data is limited, confidence is lower. EthicScan does not evaluate people, and it does not build behavioral profiles.
Notice