EthicalScanner
St. Ives 24 Hour Restoring
St. Ives · Lookup
54
Overall
Low confidence
No certifications detected. Ingredients not available. Identified by image (limited data)
How to increase confidence →
8 evidence signals
4/8 dimensions with data
Sources: EthicScan Analysis, EthicScan Company Database
Last updated: 2026-01-04
Dimension scores
4 measured
Labor
53
Environment
59
Animal Welfare
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Transparency
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Corporate Conduct
61
Geopolitical Ethics
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Health
Insufficient data
Baseline estimate (50)
Community
53
Key explanations
8 signals
AI Analysis ›
The St. Ives 24 Hour Restoring product may have some ethical concerns, including potential environmental and labor issues, but reportedly has some positive aspects such as moisturizing benefits. The product's ingredients and certifications are not fully disclosed, which may raise some concerns. Overall, the product's ethical profile is mixed and requires further investigation.
  • Potential environmental impact due to packaging and ingredient sourcing
  • Possible labor concerns in the supply chain, particularly if ingredients are sourced from countries with questionable labor practices
  • Lack of transparency regarding ingredients and certifications
  • Reportedly provides moisturizing benefits to users
  • May be cruelty-free, as St. Ives is a brand that has made commitments to animal welfare
Labor ›
1 signal(s) found affecting this dimension.
  • Company: St. Ives (Labor score: 60)
Environment ›
1 signal(s) found affecting this dimension.
  • Company: St. Ives (Environment score: 70)
Animal Welfare ›
No specific data found. Score reflects baseline estimate.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Transparency ›
No specific data found. Score reflects baseline estimate.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Corporate Conduct ›
5 signal(s) found affecting this dimension.
  • Company: St. Ives (Corporate Conduct score: 65)
  • Reported concern: Class-action lawsuit over false advertising of natural ingredients (2018) (impacts score by -8)
  • Reported concern: Criticisms over use of microbeads in products, later phased out (2015-2016)
  • Positive: Certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) for sustainable palm oil sourcing (+10 bonus)
  • Positive: Partnership with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) for sustainable tea sourcing
Geopolitical Ethics ›
No specific data found. Score reflects baseline estimate.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Health ›
No specific data found. Score reflects baseline estimate.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Community ›
1 signal(s) found affecting this dimension.
  • Company: St. Ives (Community score: 55)
About This Score ›
Based on 8 data points. Confidence: 42%. Higher confidence = more data available.
No strong public signals recorded for this dimension yet.
Evidence
0 items
No evidence recorded.
Score trend
First scan for this product. Trend data will appear after rescan.
Important
This report is conservative and evidence-weighted. If public data is limited, confidence is lower. EthicScan does not evaluate people, and it does not build behavioral profiles.
Notice